<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can lie detectors cut down on absences?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.financetechnews.com/can-lie-detectors-cut-down-on-absences/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.financetechnews.com/can-lie-detectors-cut-down-on-absences/</link>
	<description>Top technology for your bottom line</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 06:43:24 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.financetechnews.com/can-lie-detectors-cut-down-on-absences/comment-page-1/#comment-20483</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 03:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financetechnews.com/?p=176#comment-20483</guid>
		<description>Great articles &amp; Nice a site</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great articles &amp; Nice a site</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morris Jennings</title>
		<link>http://www.financetechnews.com/can-lie-detectors-cut-down-on-absences/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Morris Jennings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 14:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financetechnews.com/?p=176#comment-75</guid>
		<description>It should be pointed out that, if United States employers (other than public agencies) are tempted to utilize similar technology, they should first consider probable legal restraints. Violations might be charged under the Employee Polygraph Protection Act. The civil money penalties assessed by DOL and recovery of damages in litigation (by DOL or affected employees) would make this a very costly experiment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should be pointed out that, if United States employers (other than public agencies) are tempted to utilize similar technology, they should first consider probable legal restraints. Violations might be charged under the Employee Polygraph Protection Act. The civil money penalties assessed by DOL and recovery of damages in litigation (by DOL or affected employees) would make this a very costly experiment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 4/12 queries in 0.016 seconds using disk

Served from: www.financetechnews.com @ 2010-09-09 05:24:10 -->