Close a Window, open an Apple?
December 2, 2008 by Valerie HelmbreckPosted in: Communication, In this week's e-newsletter, Latest News & Views, Software, operating systems
Anyone keeping an eye on Microsoft’s once powerful market dominance will be interested to know Windows has suffered its biggest market share dive in the last two years.
An Internet measurement company reports that the operating system’s share of the market has dipped under 90% for the first time.
In November, 89.6% of users who connected to the Web sites that Net Applications monitors did so from systems powered by Windows, a drop of 0.84% from October. The decrease was the largest slip by Windows in the last two years, and easily beat other recent down months, including May 2008 and December 2007, when Windows lost 0.51% and 0.63 %, respectively.
And the winner is: Apple’s Mac OS X, which posted its biggest gain in the same two-year period, growing by 0.66% to end the month at 8.9 percent. November was the third month running that Apple’s operating system remained above 8%.
Because all new Apple computers now sport those nifty dual core processors, it’s attracting more and more adopters who need the flexibility of having Windows when they need it, but being able to use the more user-friendly Mac OS for anything else.
One bit of evidence that’s even more interesting: Net Applications finds that Windows’ share typically falls on weekends and after work hours, as users surf from home computers, a larger percentage of which run Mac OS X than do work machines.
FinanceTechNews.com delivers the latest Finance news once a week to the inboxes of over 150,000 Finance professionals.
Click here to sign up and start your FREE subscription to FinanceTechNews!
Tags: Apple, Mac, market share, OS, Windows

December 9th, 2008 at 10:39 am
It’s vista. Micrsoft’s shareholdes should be up in arms about their arrogance, which is driving PC sales lower.
December 9th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
MS’s trademark is arrogance.
When you can write a machine off in a few months, disposable machines make a sort of sense–or once did anyway.
Win machines are sickly beasts if allowed out of the corporate network corral.
Apples aren’t, at least yet.
Apple makes good portable hardware –or at least it is perceived as such.
Win laptops are sold primarily on price. Longevity is not mentioned.
Apple users average higher incomes. These are people who do understand ROI.
Win users are everybody else.
We’re past the point of diminishing returns for investment in more cpu and memory and disk for most people.
One of Apple’s problems used to be that the OS was a hog. On new hardware that’s not an issue.
With an Apple you can run Widows stuff if you want/have to.
On windows you can run windows stuff or windows stuff.
I don’t have an Apple. I couldn’t make a living maintaining them.